Predicting Remaining Time in Object-Centric Process Executions Using Machine Learning Models

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Corresponding Author, Department of Computer engineering, Esfarayen University of Technology, Esfarayen, Iran. Email: mohsen@esfarayen.ac.ir

10.22091/jdaid.2026.16354.1075

Abstract

Objective: Predictive process monitoring is critical for effective business process management; however, current approaches relying on case-centric logs often fail to capture the dynamics of complex, multi-object interactions. This study proposes a framework for object-centric remaining time prediction, facilitating proactive operational decisions, including systematic delay reduction, optimized resource allocation, and enhanced service quality.
Method: We developed a prediction methodology leveraging object-centric event data from real-world logs. Our feature engineering captured multidimensional information, including temporal dynamics, elapsed execution time, sequential activity history, and intricate interactions between interrelated process objects. These features were used to train and compare three machine learning architectures: a Linear Regression baseline, Random Forest, and the Gradient Boosting algorithm.
Results: Empirical analysis reveals that ensemble tree-based methods consistently outperform the linear baseline. Specifically, the Gradient Boosting model demonstrated superior prediction accuracy, successfully mitigating the noise inherent in complex process data. Feature importance analysis confirmed that elapsed time, activity histories, and object-centric interaction features serve as the most influential predictors for remaining time.
Conclusion: This research confirms that synthesizing object-centric feature extraction with ensemble learning provides a practical solution for time prediction in complex, multi-object environments. By addressing the limitations of case-centric assumptions, this approach enables more reliable forecasting and enhances operational decision-making in diverse real-world process management contexts, thereby bridging a significant research gap.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Adams, J. N. (2025). Object-centric process mining: Concepts and advancements [Doctoral dissertation, RWTH Aachen University].
Adams, J. N., Drescher, H., Swoboda, A., Günnemann, N., Park, G., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (n.d.). Improving predictive process monitoring using object-centric process mining.
Adams, J. N., Park, G., Levich, S., Schuster, D., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2023). A framework for extracting and encoding features from object-centric event data. Expert Systems with Applications, 213, Article 119173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119173
Adams, J. N., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2021). Precision and fitness in object-centric process mining. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Process Mining (ICPM 2021) (pp. 128–135). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPM53251.2021.9576886
Augusto, A., Conforti, R., Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Maggi, F. M., Marrella, A., Mecella, M., & Soo, A. (2019). Automated discovery of process models from event logs: Review and benchmark. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 31(4), 686–705. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2018.2841877
Berti, A., Herforth, J., Qafari, M. S., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2022). Graph-based feature extraction on object-centric event logs [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.03904
Carmona, J., van Dongen, B. F., Solti, A., & Weidlich, M. (2018). Conformance checking: Relating processes and models. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99414-7
de Leoni, M. (2022). Foundations of process enhancement. In W. M. P. van der Aalst & J. Carmona (Eds.), Process mining handbook: Lecture notes in business information processing (Vol. 448, pp. 243–273). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08848-3_8
de Leoni, M., & Volpato, P. (2025). Global predictive monitoring of object-centric processes. In International Conference on Business Process Management (pp. 255–272). Springer.
Fioretto, S., & Masciari, E. (2025). A comparative analysis of predictive process monitoring: Object-centric versus classical event logs. Knowledge and Information Systems, 67(9), 7355–7398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-025-02384-y
Galanti, R., de Leoni, M., Navarin, N., & Marazzi, A. (2023). Object-centric process predictive analytics. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Process Mining.
Gherissi, W., El Haddad, J., & Grigori, D. (2022). Object-centric predictive process monitoring. In Service-oriented computing: ICSOC 2022 workshops (pp. 27–39). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26507-5_3
Maggi, F. M., Di Francescomarino, C., Dumas, M., & Ghidini, C. (2014). Predictive monitoring of business processes. In Advanced information systems engineering: CAiSE 2014: Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 8484, pp. 1–16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07881-6
Park, G., Adams, J. N., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2022). OPerA: Object-centric performance analysis. In Conceptual modeling: ER 2022 (pp. 281–292). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17995-2_20
Rohrer, T., Ghahfarokhi, A. F., Behery, M., Lakemeyer, G., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2022). Predictive object-centric process monitoring [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.10017
Task Force on Process Mining. (n.d.). Resources: Logs. https://www.tf-pm.org/resources/logs
van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2016). Process mining: Data science in action (2nd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49851-4
van der Aalst, W. M. P., & Berti, A. (2020). Discovering object-centric Petri nets. Fundamenta Informaticae, 175(1–4), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.3233/FI-2020-1946
 
Journal of Data Analytics and Intelligent Decision-making

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 30 September 2026

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics